[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100701172317.GB1830@laptop>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 03:23:17 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/52] vfs scalability patches updated
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:40:49PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> But actually it's not all for scalability. I have some follow on patches
> (that require RCU inodes, among other things) that actually improve
> single threaded performance significnatly. git diff workload IIRC was
> several % improved from speeding up stat(2).
I rewrote the store-free path walk patch that goes on top of this
patchset (it's now much cleaner and more optimised, I'll post a patch
soonish). It is quicker than I remembered.
A single thread running stat(2) in a loop on a file "./file" has the
following cost (on an 2s8c Barcelona):
2.6.35-rc3 595 ns/op
patched 336 ns/op
stat(2) takes 56% the time with patches. It's something like 13 fewer
atomic operations per syscall.
What's that good for? A single threaded, cached `git diff` on the linux
kernel tree takes just 81% of the time after the vfs patches (0.27s vs
0.33s).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists