[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100701173434.545880312@clark.site>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:34:38 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: [patch 092/164] signals: check_kill_permission(): dont check creds if same_thread_group()
2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
commit 065add3941bdca54fe04ed3471a96bce9af88793 upstream.
Andrew Tridgell reports that aio_read(SIGEV_SIGNAL) can fail if the
notification from the helper thread races with setresuid(), see
http://samba.org/~tridge/junkcode/aio_uid.c
This happens because check_kill_permission() doesn't permit sending a
signal to the task with the different cred->xids. But there is not any
security reason to check ->cred's when the task sends a signal (private or
group-wide) to its sub-thread. Whatever we do, any thread can bypass all
security checks and send SIGKILL to all threads, or it can block a signal
SIG and do kill(gettid(), SIG) to deliver this signal to another
sub-thread. Not to mention that CLONE_THREAD implies CLONE_VM.
Change check_kill_permission() to avoid the credentials check when the
sender and the target are from the same thread group.
Also, move "cred = current_cred()" down to avoid calling get_current()
twice.
Note: David Howells pointed out we could relax this even more, the
CLONE_SIGHAND (without CLONE_THREAD) case probably does not need
these checks too.
Roland said:
: The glibc (libpthread) that does set*id across threads has
: been in use for a while (2.3.4?), probably in distro's using kernels as old
: or older than any active -stable streams. In the race in question, this
: kernel bug is breaking valid POSIX application expectations.
Reported-by: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
kernel/signal.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static inline bool si_fromuser(const str
static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct siginfo *info,
struct task_struct *t)
{
- const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *tcred;
+ const struct cred *cred, *tcred;
struct pid *sid;
int error;
@@ -639,8 +639,10 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig
if (error)
return error;
+ cred = current_cred();
tcred = __task_cred(t);
- if ((cred->euid ^ tcred->suid) &&
+ if (!same_thread_group(current, t) &&
+ (cred->euid ^ tcred->suid) &&
(cred->euid ^ tcred->uid) &&
(cred->uid ^ tcred->suid) &&
(cred->uid ^ tcred->uid) &&
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists