[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100701231207.GB27389@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:12:07 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: g@...temov.name, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Anfei Zhou <anfei.zhou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 071/149] ARM: 6166/1: Proper prefetch abort handling on
pre-ARMv6
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:59:11AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:48:37PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > One possibility is that for some reason you're using the legacy prefetch
> > abort code or pre-IFSR code, which will always tell the kernel that its
> > a translation fault - and in this case, this patch would improve the
> > situation. What kernel version are you using?
>
> 2.6.32
Should be recent enough.
> If you run this test in loop on kernel without the patch you'll finally
> get hung instead SIGSEGV.
>
> It seems the patch fixes more than it was written for. :)
Have you investigated the IFSR and IFAR values, and the corresponding
page table state? I'm not going to be able to run your test code for
a few days.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists