[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278057944.32034.15085.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:05:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Call update_group_power only for local_group
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 16:12 -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> commit 871e35b moved update_group_power() call in update_sg_lb_stats(),
> resulting in it being called for each group, even though it only updates
> the power of local group. As a result we have frequent redundant
> update_group_power() calls.
>
> Move it back under "if (local_group)" condition.
>
> This reduces the number of calls to update_group_power by a factor of 4
> on my 4 core in 4 NUMA nodes test system.
Hrm,.. so Gautham removed that because for things like the NO_HZ
balancer the initial balance_cpu == this_cpu constraint doesn't hold.
Not I don't think the local_group constraint holds for that either, so
the below would again break that..
Should we perhaps have a conditional on this_rq->nohz_balance_kick or
so?
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -2359,8 +2359,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
> unsigned int balance_cpu = -1, first_idle_cpu = 0;
> unsigned long avg_load_per_task = 0;
>
> - if (local_group)
> + if (local_group) {
> balance_cpu = group_first_cpu(group);
> + update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
> + }
> +
>
> /* Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group */
> max_cpu_load = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists