[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100702121456.GD1904@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:14:56 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cred - synchronize rcu before releasing cred
hi,
any feedback?
jirka
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:33:33AM -0400, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> BZ 591015 - kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:168
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591015
>
> Above bugzilla reported bug during the releasing of
> old cred structure.
>
> There is reproducer attached to the bugzilla.
>
> The issue is caused by releasing old cred struct while other
> kernel path might be still using it. This leads to cred->usage
> inconsistency inside the __put_cred and triggering the bug.
>
> Following kernel paths are affected:
>
> The CPU1 path is setting the new groups creds.
> The CPU2 path is cat /proc/PID/status
>
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
>
> sys_setgroups proc_pid_status
> set_current_groups task_state
> commit_creds rcu_read_lock
> put_cred ...
> __put_cred get_cred
> BUG_ON(usage != 0) ...
> rcu_read_unlock
>
>
>
> If __put_cred got executed during the CPU2 holding the reference
> the BUG_ON inside __put_cred is trigered.
>
> I think there's no need to get the cred refference as long as
> the 'cred' handling stays inside the rcu_read_lock block.
>
> And the condition of __task_cred 'make sure task doesn't go away',
> is done by proc_single_show as this is the proc file.
>
> wbr,
> jirka
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index 9b58d38..ac3b3a4 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> if (tracer)
> tpid = task_pid_nr_ns(tracer, ns);
> }
> - cred = get_cred((struct cred *) __task_cred(p));
> + cred = __task_cred(p);
> seq_printf(m,
> "State:\t%s\n"
> "Tgid:\t%d\n"
> @@ -199,15 +199,14 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> "FDSize:\t%d\n"
> "Groups:\t",
> fdt ? fdt->max_fds : 0);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> group_info = cred->group_info;
> task_unlock(p);
>
> for (g = 0; g < min(group_info->ngroups, NGROUPS_SMALL); g++)
> seq_printf(m, "%d ", GROUP_AT(group_info, g));
> - put_cred(cred);
>
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> seq_printf(m, "\n");
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists