[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278075338.3154.10.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:55:38 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 15:36 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 16:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Not exactly sure how I could have messed up the ARM architecture code to
> > make this happen though... will have a peek.
>
> I did find a bug in there, not sure it could have been responsible for
> this but who knows...
>
> Pushed out a new git tree with the below delta folded in.
>
I had a look at this yesterday and discovered a bug in the ARM
backend code, which I've posted a patch for to ALKML:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/019461.html
Unfortunately, with this applied and your latest changes I still
get 0 from pinned hardware counters:
# perf stat -r 5 -e cycles -e instructions -e cs -e faults -e branches -a -- git status
Performance counter stats for 'git status' (5 runs):
0 cycles ( +- nan% )
0 instructions # 0.000 IPC ( +- nan% )
88447 context-switches ( +- 12.624% )
13647 page-faults ( +- 0.015% )
0 branches ( +- nan% )
The changes you've made to arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
look sane. If I get some time I'll try and dig deeper.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists