[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c3945c6-6a5d-48f9-bf6e-1e0b19edc2e2@default>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jeremy@...inet12.oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com]
> >
> > Thanks for the thorough reply! Any reason that any of these
> > cannot or should not be back-ported to go into 4.0.1?
>
> They should be safe to backport, the only ones we should be extra
> careful are the TSC related patches, and you were the one to raise that
> complain :)
> If you have some spare time to test 21445 and 21339 on 4.0.1 to make
> sure that everything keeps working as expected, then we can safely
> apply them to xen 4.0 testing.
Thanks, yes, I was putting that task on my list and wasn't sure
what the full set of required changes were and if there were
interdependencies so that I could test on 4.0-testing instead
of on xen-unstable. (Depending on Keir's 4.0.1 schedule, I
might not get it done in time for 4.0.1 though.)
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists