linux-kernel - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc:	Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Jeremy@...inet12.oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen

> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com]
> >
> > Thanks for the thorough reply!  Any reason that any of these
> > cannot or should not be back-ported to go into 4.0.1?
> 
> They should be safe to backport, the only ones we should be extra
> careful are the TSC related patches, and you were the one to raise that
> complain :)
> If you have some spare time to test 21445 and 21339 on 4.0.1 to make
> sure that everything keeps working as expected, then we can safely
> apply them to xen 4.0 testing.

Thanks, yes, I was putting that task on my list and wasn't sure
what the full set of required changes were and if there were
interdependencies so that I could test on 4.0-testing instead
of on xen-unstable.  (Depending on Keir's 4.0.1 schedule, I
might not get it done in time for 4.0.1 though.)

Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/