| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1278100699-24132-6-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:58:18 -0400 From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com, tao.ma@...cle.com, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> Subject: [PATCH 5/6] jbd2: use WRITE_SYNC for journal I/O In my fsync testing, journal I/O most definitely was sync I/O, since another process was blocked waiting for the results. By marking all journal I/O as WRITE_SYNC, I can get better performance with CFQ. If there is a way to mark this only for cases where it is blocking progress in a dependent process, then that would be preferrable. Is there such a means for determining and flagging this? Cheers, Jeff Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> --- fs/jbd2/commit.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c index 75716d3..a078744 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal) int tag_bytes = journal_tag_bytes(journal); struct buffer_head *cbh = NULL; /* For transactional checksums */ __u32 crc32_sum = ~0; - int write_op = WRITE; + int write_op = WRITE_SYNC; /* * First job: lock down the current transaction and wait for -- 1.6.5.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists