linux-kernel - Re: [patch 119/149] ext4: check s_log_groups_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100702041102.GJ1333@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:11:02 -0400
From:	tytso@....edu
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 119/149] ext4: check s_log_groups_per_flex in online
 resize code

On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:32:25AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

My only objection to these patches is that I don't know if they are
going to cause patch conflicts with the 50 or so patches which I sent
you for 2.6.32, which include both this patch and the next one.  When
I backported the patches I did have to adjust some of them to make
sure they would apply cleanly to the latest 2.6.32.X release.  By
cherry picking them, it could be that dropping those patches from
could cause no problems at all; or it could be a bit of a headache.

So it might be easier to drop these two and then wait for the next
2.6.32 stable release (which will hopefully be coming soon!) and just
take my whole set of patches....

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/