[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100703225613.1236bf07@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 22:56:13 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: "宾西蒙" <binximeng@...il.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>,
Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ethan Lawrence <e.law87@...oo.com>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lars4910@...mail.com,
birdie@...monline.ru, jadcock@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] hwmon: Add support for W83667HG-B and
W83667HG-I to w83627ehf driver.
Hi 宾西蒙,
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:15:48 +0200, 宾西蒙 wrote:
> 在 2010-07-03六的 10:35 +0200,Jean Delvare写道:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:23:26 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > + w83667hg-i 9 5 3 3 0xb340 0xc1 0x5ca3
> >
> > As discussed before, this one is a 677 series, not 667. That being
> > said, I admit that the device ID proximity between the 667HG-B and the
> > 677HG-I is troubling, and invites to optimism as far as compatibility
> > between these two chips is concerned.
>
> I think we got something confused here, I was looking for the W836
> *seven* 7 HG-I driver (which has ID 0xb470) and not the W836 *six* 7
> HG-I one, although maybe someone else might benefit from that one.
Yes, there was some confusion. For one thing, the W83667HG-I does not
exist. And for another, I have no idea where Guenter found the device
id 0xb340. None of the Nuvoton W836x7HG datasheets I have mention this
ID. All I know of is 0xb350 for the W83667HG-B and 0xb470 for the
W83677HG-I (which apparently was renamed to something different
meanwhile.)
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists