lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100703103536.2fdd833e@hyperion.delvare>
Date:	Sat, 3 Jul 2010 10:35:36 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
Cc:	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
	H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>,
	Ethan Lawrence <e.law87@...oo.com>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lars4910@...mail.com,
	birdie@...monline.ru, jadcock@....net, binximeng@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] hwmon: Add support for W83667HG-B and W83667HG-I
 to w83627ehf driver.

Hi Guenter,

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:23:26 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
> ---
> Key relevant difference between W83667HG and W83667HG-B are the Chip ID as well
> as the fan output and step output register addresses. Those differences are
> addressed with this patch.
> 
> There are other relevant changes in the mapping of input sensors to fan
> control (W83667HG datasheet chapter 8.7, W83667HG-B datasheet chapter 8.5).
> However, control of those mappings is not implemented in the driver, thus the
> respective changes should not have an impact on driver operation.
> 
> Changes made in this patch are based on information from datasheets only. The
> patch has not yet been tested with real hardware. The patch will have to be
> tested with real hardware before it is integrated, and is thus submitted as RFC.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed dash from hwmon device name.
> - Moved global array pointers to per-device data.
> - Added chip detection for W83667HG-I
>   (assumed to be identical to W83667HG; needs to be validated).
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c b/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c
> index 0dcaba9..099454b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
>      w83627dhg    9      5       4       3      0xa020 0xc1    0x5ca3
>      w83627dhg-p  9      5       4       3      0xb070 0xc1    0x5ca3
>      w83667hg     9      5       3       3      0xa510 0xc1    0x5ca3
> +    w83667hg-i   9      5       3       3      0xb340 0xc1    0x5ca3

As discussed before, this one is a 677 series, not 667. That being
said, I admit that the device ID proximity between the 667HG-B and the
677HG-I is troubling, and invites to optimism as far as compatibility
between these two chips is concerned.

> +    w83667hg-b   9      5       3       3      0xb350 0xc1    0x5ca3
>  */
>  
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include "lm75.h"
>  
> -enum kinds { w83627ehf, w83627dhg, w83627dhg_p, w83667hg };
> +enum kinds { w83627ehf, w83627dhg, w83627dhg_p, w83667hg, w83667hg_b };
>  
>  /* used to set data->name = w83627ehf_device_names[data->sio_kind] */
>  static const char * w83627ehf_device_names[] = {
> @@ -63,6 +65,7 @@ static const char * w83627ehf_device_names[] = {
>  	"w83627dhg",
>  	"w83627dhg",
>  	"w83667hg",
> +	"w83667hg",
>  };
>  
>  static unsigned short force_id;
> @@ -91,6 +94,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_id, "Override the detected device ID");
>  #define SIO_W83627DHG_ID	0xa020
>  #define SIO_W83627DHG_P_ID	0xb070
>  #define SIO_W83667HG_ID 	0xa510
> +#define SIO_W83667HG_I_ID	0xb340
> +#define SIO_W83667HG_B_ID	0xb350
>  #define SIO_ID_MASK		0xFFF0
>  
>  static inline void
> @@ -201,8 +206,14 @@ static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_TOLERANCE[] = { 0x07, 0x07, 0x14, 0x62 };
>  static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_START_OUTPUT[] = { 0x0a, 0x0b, 0x16, 0x65 };
>  static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STOP_OUTPUT[] = { 0x08, 0x09, 0x15, 0x64 };
>  static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STOP_TIME[] = { 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x17, 0x66 };
> -static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT[] = { 0xff, 0x67, 0xff, 0x69 };
> -static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT[] = { 0xff, 0x68, 0xff, 0x6a };
> +
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_COMMON[]
> +						= { 0xff, 0x67, 0xff, 0x69 };
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_COMMON[]
> +						= { 0xff, 0x68, 0xff, 0x6a };
> +
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_W83667_B[] = { 0x67, 0x69, 0x6b };
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_W83667_B[] = { 0x68, 0x6a, 0x6c };
>  
>  /*
>   * Conversions
> @@ -277,6 +288,11 @@ struct w83627ehf_data {
>  	struct device *hwmon_dev;
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  
> +	const u8 *REG_FAN_START_OUTPUT;
> +	const u8 *REG_FAN_STOP_OUTPUT;
> +	const u8 *REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT;
> +	const u8 *REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT;
> +
>  	struct mutex update_lock;
>  	char valid;		/* !=0 if following fields are valid */
>  	unsigned long last_updated;	/* In jiffies */
> @@ -1126,7 +1142,7 @@ store_##reg(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, \
>  	u32 val = SENSORS_LIMIT(simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 10), 1, 255); \
>  	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock); \
>  	data->reg[nr] = val; \
> -	w83627ehf_write_value(data, W83627EHF_REG_##REG[nr], val); \
> +	w83627ehf_write_value(data, data->REG_##REG[nr], val); \
>  	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock); \
>  	return count; \
>  }
> @@ -1343,22 +1359,37 @@ static int __devinit w83627ehf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	/* 627EHG and 627EHF have 10 voltage inputs; 627DHG and 667HG have 9 */
>  	data->in_num = (sio_data->kind == w83627ehf) ? 10 : 9;
>  	/* 667HG has 3 pwms */
> -	data->pwm_num = (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) ? 3 : 4;
> +	data->pwm_num = (sio_data->kind == w83667hg
> +			 || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) ? 3 : 4;
>  
>  	/* Check temp3 configuration bit for 667HG */
> -	if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) {
> +	if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
>  		data->temp3_disable = w83627ehf_read_value(data,
>  					W83627EHF_REG_TEMP_CONFIG[1]) & 0x01;
>  		data->in6_skip = !data->temp3_disable;
>  	}
>  
> +	data->REG_FAN_START_OUTPUT = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_START_OUTPUT;
> +	data->REG_FAN_STOP_OUTPUT = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STOP_OUTPUT;
> +	if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
> +		data->REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT
> +		  = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_W83667_B;
> +		data->REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT
> +		  = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_W83667_B;
> +	} else {
> +		data->REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT
> +		  = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_COMMON;
> +		data->REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT
> +		  = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_COMMON;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Initialize the chip */
>  	w83627ehf_init_device(data);
>  
>  	data->vrm = vid_which_vrm();
>  	superio_enter(sio_data->sioreg);
>  	/* Read VID value */
> -	if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) {
> +	if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
>  		/* W83667HG has different pins for VID input and output, so
>  		we can get the VID input values directly at logical device D
>  		0xe3. */
> @@ -1409,7 +1440,7 @@ static int __devinit w83627ehf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* fan4 and fan5 share some pins with the GPIO and serial flash */
> -	if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) {
> +	if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
>  		fan5pin = superio_inb(sio_data->sioreg, 0x27) & 0x20;
>  		fan4pin = superio_inb(sio_data->sioreg, 0x27) & 0x40;
>  	} else {
> @@ -1556,6 +1587,8 @@ static int __init w83627ehf_find(int sioaddr, unsigned short *addr,
>  	static const char __initdata sio_name_W83627DHG[] = "W83627DHG";
>  	static const char __initdata sio_name_W83627DHG_P[] = "W83627DHG-P";
>  	static const char __initdata sio_name_W83667HG[] = "W83667HG";
> +	static const char __initdata sio_name_W83667HG_I[] = "W83667HG-I";
> +	static const char __initdata sio_name_W83667HG_B[] = "W83667HG-B";
>  
>  	u16 val;
>  	const char *sio_name;
> @@ -1588,6 +1621,14 @@ static int __init w83627ehf_find(int sioaddr, unsigned short *addr,
>  		sio_data->kind = w83667hg;
>  		sio_name = sio_name_W83667HG;
>  		break;
> +	case SIO_W83667HG_I_ID:
> +		sio_data->kind = w83667hg;
> +		sio_name = sio_name_W83667HG_I;
> +		break;
> +	case SIO_W83667HG_B_ID:
> +		sio_data->kind = w83667hg_b;
> +		sio_name = sio_name_W83667HG_B;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		if (val != 0xffff)
>  			pr_debug(DRVNAME ": unsupported chip ID: 0x%04x\n",

Other than this, I have no objection, your patch looks sane.

After your next iteration, I'll publish a standalone driver with your
patch, for easier testing.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ