[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2F0CC1.6020808@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:11:13 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@...css.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: IOAPIC: only access APIC registers one dword
at a time
On 07/02/2010 11:00 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> The IOAPIC spec says:
>
> When accessing these registers, accesses must be done one dword at a time.
> For example, software should never access byte 2 from the Data register before
> accessing bytes 0 and 1. The hardware will not attempt to recover from a bad
> programming model in this case.
>
> So, this patch removes other width access
>
>
The ioapic code also implements the ia64 iosapic. I'm guessing that
does support 64-bit accesses. Please check the iosapic documentation.
There might be guests that use incorrect access despite the
documentation; if real hardware supports it, it should work. So we need
to start with just a warning, and allow the access. Later we can drop
the invalid access.
> @@ -288,6 +288,11 @@ static int ioapic_mmio_read(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr, int len,
> ioapic_debug("addr %lx\n", (unsigned long)addr);
> ASSERT(!(addr& 0xf)); /* check alignment */
>
> + if (len != 4) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "ioapic: wrong length %d\n", len);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
>
Guest triggered, so needs to be rate limited.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists