lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 03 Jul 2010 20:16:12 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk
 and pte prefetch



Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/03/2010 01:31 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>> See how the pte is reread inside fetch with mmu_lock held.
>>>
>>>      
>> It looks like something is broken in 'fetch' functions, this patch will
>> fix it.
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: fix last level broken in FNAME(fetch)
>>
>> We read the guest level out of 'mmu_lock', sometimes, the host mapping is
>> confusion. Consider this case:
>>
>> VCPU0:                                              VCPU1
>>
>> Read guest mapping, assume the mapping is:
>> GLV3 ->  GLV2 ->  GLV1 ->  GFNA,
>> And in the host, the corresponding mapping is
>> HLV3 ->  HLV2 ->  HLV1(P=0)
>>
>>                                                     Write GLV1 and
>> cause the
>>                                                     mapping point to GFNB
>>                                                     (May occur in
>> pte_write or
>>                                                        invlpg path)
>>
>> Mapping GLV1 to GFNA
>>
>> This issue only occurs in the last indirect mapping, since if the middle
>> mapping is changed, the mapping will be zapped, then it will be detected
>> in the FNAME(fetch) path, but when it map the last level, it not checked.
>>
>> Fixed by also check the last level.
>>
>>    
> 
> I don't really see what is fixed.  We already check the gpte.  What's
> special about the new scenario?
> 

I mean is: while we map the last level, we will directly set to the pfn but
the pfn is got by walk_addr, at this time, the guest mapping may be changed.

What is the 'We already check the gpte' mean? i think i miss something :-(

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists