linux-kernel - [PATCH 11/23] x86,lmb: Add lmb_x86_reserve_range/lmb_x86_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat,  3 Jul 2010 23:56:15 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/23] x86,lmb: Add lmb_x86_reserve_range/lmb_x86_free_range

they are wrappers for core versions.
they are taking start/end/name instead of base/size.
will make x86 conversion more easy

could add more debug print out

-v2: change get_max_mapped() to lmb.default_alloc_limit according to Michael
      Ellerman and Ben
     change to lmb_x86_reserve_range and lmb_x86_free_range according to Michael Ellerman
-v3: call check_and_double after reserve/free, so could avoid to use
      find_lmb_area. Suggested by Michael Ellerman

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h |    3 +++
 arch/x86/mm/lmb.c          |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h
index 4a1b299..a6f14c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h
@@ -6,4 +6,7 @@
 u64 lmb_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
 void lmb_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end);
 
+void lmb_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
+void lmb_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c b/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
index 61b292f..a6c2662 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
@@ -116,3 +116,25 @@ void __init lmb_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end)
 		lmb_reserve(__pa(lmb.reserved.regions), sizeof(struct lmb_region) * lmb.reserved.max);
 }
 #endif
+
+void __init lmb_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name)
+{
+	if (start == end)
+		return;
+
+	if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "lmb_x86_reserve_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end))
+		return;
+
+	lmb_reserve(start, end - start);
+}
+
+void __init lmb_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+	if (start == end)
+		return;
+
+	if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "lmb_x86_free_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end))
+		return;
+
+	lmb_free(start, end - start);
+}
-- 
1.6.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/