[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C309B60.9080502@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:32:00 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk
and pte prefetch
On 07/03/2010 03:57 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>>> And this check is not sufficient, since it's only checked if the
>>> mapping is zapped or not exist, for other words only when broken this
>>> judgment:
>>> is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)&& !is_large_pte(*sptep)
>>>
>>> but if the middle level is present and it's not the large mapping,
>>> this check is skipped.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, in the description, it looked like everything was using small
>> pages (in kvm, level=1 means PTE level, we need to change this one
>> day). Please describe again and say exactly when the guest or host uses
>> large pages.
>>
>>
> Avi, sorry for my poor English, i not mean "everything was using small", i don't
> know where cause you confused :-(
>
Well, LVL1 got me to assume those are small pages.
Can you explain more precisely? Use the processor terms like PTE and
PDE. Don't worry about your English :)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists