[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100705124549.GA2260@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:45:49 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@...i.ir>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, dfeng@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, venki@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [regression] commit 6a4f3b52 causes invalid memtype
* Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@...i.ir> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > > > >> commit 2463eb8b3093995e09a0d41b3d78ee0cf5fb4249
> > > > >> Author: Peter Zijlstra<peterz@...radead.org>
> > > > >> Date: Sat May 29 15:31:43 2010 +0200
> > > > >>
> > > > >> rbtree: Undo augmented trees performance damage
> > > > >
> > > > > Where can I get it? I couldn't find it either in
> > > > > Linus' or x86 repo tip.
> > > > http://git.kernel.org/tip/2463eb8b3093995e09a0d41b3d78ee0cf5fb4249
> > >
> > > It does fix it.
> >
> > Hm, interesting. That's a pure performance fix - so why does it fix a
> > regression?
> >
> > Does Peter's augmented rbtrees improvements fix a bug too, as a side-effect?
> > If yes then we need to accelerate that commit - right now it's aimed for
> > v2.6.36.
>
> Since the bug appears after commit 6a4f3b52, it seems to be
> related to the value of memtype->subtree_max_end. Peter's
> patch seems to change the way memtype->subtree_max_end is
> updated, which seems to fix the problem too.
Ok - i've cherry-picked it over into x86/urgent and it should go to Linus in
the next round of x86 fixes.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists