linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fixed division by zero bug in kernel/padata.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100705135306.GP10072@secunet.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jul 2010 15:53:06 +0200
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Dan Kruchinin <dkruchinin@....org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed division by zero bug in kernel/padata.c

On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:43:57PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:35:32PM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote:
> >
> > > Both cases should be handled in the same way. So we could just
> > > stop the instance if the cpumasks do not intersect, and enable
> > > it as soon as they do intersect again. The padata instance would
> > > refuse to do anything as long as the cpumasks do not intersect,
> > > but it is still in a consistent state. Let me add the infrastructure
> > > to handle this, then you can use it with your patches.
> > 
> > Ok, get it.
> 
> So I should wait for another patch, right?
> 

Right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/