linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: remove BKL uses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100705145324.GA5240@nowhere>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:53:29 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>,
	linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: remove BKL uses

On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 04 July 2010, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > Nilfs has BKL uses in its put_super and remount functions, but none of
> > them are necessary, just came from earlier push downs.  This
> > eliminates the BKL uses from nilfs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
> 
> This looks good, but there is a another patch series pushing the BKL
> into the get_sb and fill_super operations, which should be the final
> pushdown for file systems. I wonder if there is a way to find a
> shortcut on this so we don't need to add it first just to have you
> go through the effort of removing it again.


I could take his patch in the mount pushdown series.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/