[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1007051706530.15185@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:07:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/net: correct valid flag
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Elsewhere in the "optimized" functions, the "2" constants are used.
NV_TX_VALID and NV_TX2_VALID have the same value.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
index 268ea4d..870c18b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
@@ -2468,7 +2468,8 @@ static int nv_tx_done_optimized(struct net_device *dev, int limit)
struct ring_desc_ex* orig_get_tx = np->get_tx.ex;
while ((np->get_tx.ex != np->put_tx.ex) &&
- !((flags = le32_to_cpu(np->get_tx.ex->flaglen)) & NV_TX_VALID) &&
+ !((flags = le32_to_cpu(np->get_tx.ex->flaglen)) & NV_TX2_VALID)
+ &&
(tx_work < limit)) {
dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: nv_tx_done_optimized: flags 0x%x.\n",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists