[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100705100239.9f92d5e4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:02:39 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiro SEKIBA <jir@...cus.jp>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nilfs tree
Hi Al,
Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
fs/nilfs2/super.c between commit 9fafbf39607e8002f90ca24b74ccd5be5087e50f
("nilfs2: sync super blocks in turns") from the nilfs tree and commit
030c97b8a358cc3d6322b64ecb67adb849e27cd1 ("convert nilfs2 to
->evict_inode()") from the vfs tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/nilfs2/super.c
index 29be735,7c7572a..0000000
--- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
@@@ -168,24 -159,7 +168,7 @@@ void nilfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *
kmem_cache_free(nilfs_inode_cachep, NILFS_I(inode));
}
- static void nilfs_clear_inode(struct inode *inode)
- {
- struct nilfs_inode_info *ii = NILFS_I(inode);
-
- /*
- * Free resources allocated in nilfs_read_inode(), here.
- */
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&ii->i_dirty));
- brelse(ii->i_bh);
- ii->i_bh = NULL;
-
- if (test_bit(NILFS_I_BMAP, &ii->i_state))
- nilfs_bmap_clear(ii->i_bmap);
-
- nilfs_btnode_cache_clear(&ii->i_btnode_cache);
- }
-
-static int nilfs_sync_super(struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi, int dupsb)
+static int nilfs_sync_super(struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi, int flag)
{
struct the_nilfs *nilfs = sbi->s_nilfs;
int err;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists