[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100705171420.GA29697@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:14:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [regression] Crash in wb_clear_pending() (was: Linux 2.6.35-rc4)
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > We had a thread about it a few days ago. The following commit from
> > Jens' 2.6.36 tree needs to go into 2.6.35 to sort the issues with the
> > fragile wakeup mechanism which only got worse by the patches out:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commitdiff;h=79338d2a78ab78efdc1698f1309766a039addf9d
>
> I've attached it below - in case someone wants to apply it before it hits
> upstream.
>
> Scary big patch btw. - is there no smaller fix?
Nor does it apply to v2.6.35-rc4:
Applying: writeback: simplify the write back thread queue
error: patch failed: fs/fs-writeback.c:703
error: fs/fs-writeback.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 writeback: simplify the write back thread queue
I guess it has other dependencies as well. If you want me to test the fix then
please send a version that applies.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists