lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100705071553.GD18865@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:15:53 +0200
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Christoph Egger <siccegge@...fau.de>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vamos@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/33] Removing dead PROCESSOR_NS9750

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:58:48PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> PROCESSOR_NS9750 doesn't exist in Kconfig, therefore removing all
> references for it from the source code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...fau.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/gpio.c |    8 --------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/gpio.c
> index 5503ca0..58f4f50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/gpio.c
> @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PROCESSOR_NS9360)
>  #define GPIO_MAX 72
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_PROCESSOR_NS9750)
> -#define GPIO_MAX 49
> -#endif
>  
>  /* protects BBU_GCONFx and BBU_GCTRLx */
>  static spinlock_t gpio_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(gpio_lock);
> @@ -42,11 +39,6 @@ static inline int ns9xxx_valid_gpio(unsigned gpio)
>  		return gpio <= 72;
>  	else
>  #endif
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PROCESSOR_NS9750)
> -	if (processor_is_ns9750())
> -		return gpio <= 49;
> -	else
> -#endif
>  	{
>  		BUG();
>  		return 0;
The code is correct as is, but AFAIK the ns9750 isn't supported anymore
even in the Digi provided BSPs and as it seems there aren't any efforts
to maintain ns9xxx in mainline.

So, Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ