linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] rlimits: security, add task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1007051031240.21265@tundra.namei.org>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:32:19 +1000 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	adobriyan@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] rlimits: security, add task_struct to
 setrlimit

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote:

> On 06/24/2010 01:58 AM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Add task_struct to task_setrlimit of security_operations to be able to set
> >> rlimit of task other than current.
> > 
> > Given the scope of the changes, I'm not sure which tree these should go 
> > into.  They affect the security API, so possibly mine.
> 
> If there are no objections, could you take it? Or maybe Andrew, if we
> persuaded him?

A bunch of these patches have no acked-by or reviewed-by, which means 
they still need to be reviewed.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/