[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100705084437.GB29648@spritzera.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:44:37 +0900
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] hugetlb: add missing unlock in avoidcopy path in
hugetlb_cow()
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:47:20PM +0900, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > This patch fixes possible deadlock in hugepage lock_page()
> > by adding missing unlock_page().
> >
> > libhugetlbfs test will hit this bug when the next patch in this
> > patchset ("hugetlb, HWPOISON: move PG_HWPoison bit check") is applied.
>
> This looks like a general bug fix that should be merged ASAP?
>
> Or do you think this cannot be hit at all without the other patches?
This bug was introduced by patch "hugetlb, rmap: add reverse mapping for
hugepage" in previous patchset (currently in linux-next) and it's not
merged in mainline yet.
So it's OK if this patch goes into linux-next by its merge to mainline.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists