[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100706150030.CCFA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:02:31 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] vmscan: Do not writeback pages in direct reclaim
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:36 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >> Ok, that's reasonable as I'm still working on that patch. For example, the
> >> patch disabled anonymous page writeback which is unnecessary as the stack
> >> usage for anon writeback is less than file writeback.
> >
> > How do we examine swap-on-file?
>
> bool is_swap_on_file(struct page *page)
> {
> struct swap_info_struct *p;
> swp_entry_entry entry;
> entry.val = page_private(page);
> p = swap_info_get(entry);
> return !(p->flags & SWP_BLKDEV)
> }
Well, do you suggested we traverse all pages in lru _before_
starting vmscan?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists