[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C32CC6A.3070004@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:25:46 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [regression] Crash in wb_clear_pending()
On 2010-07-06 01:34, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Absent a small fix, and given that the big fix has a lot more testing than
>> any new patch might, in this case the quickie might be undesirable.
>> Particularly since posters here seem sure that code will be replaced in the
>> next version anyway, and lightly tested patch to obsolete code is actually
>> less conservative.
>
> I have to agree. Especially as the "big patch" just removes the
> fragile code that caused the problem in the first place. So in this
> case I do suspect that the bigger patch ends up being the safer one.
OK, it's up to you.
> But I obviously don't actually see the problem, so it would be good to
> get confirmation that Christoph's patch actually fixes things first.
> Ingo, does the one in this thread apply for you?
I'll update for-linus, Ingo can try that.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists