linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Fix fallback to cplus_demangle() when bfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100706065904.GC16224@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:59:04 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Fix fallback to cplus_demangle() when
 bfd_demangle() is not available


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org> wrote:

> From: Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@....com>
> 
> make version 3.80 doesn't support "else ifdef" on the same line, also it
> doesn't support unindented nested constructs.
> 
> Build fails with:
> Makefile:608: Extraneous text after `else' directive
> Makefile:611: *** only one `else' per conditional.  Stop.
> 
> This patch fixes the build for make 3.80.

Since 3.81 is the latest Make version and 3.80 is just one step before that, 
shouldnt we cherry-pick this into perf/urgent? (or is current upstream 
unaffected?)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/