[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C32D4BE.9030005@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:01:18 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
fweisbec@...il.com, dwalker@...eaurora.org,
stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, florian@...kler.org,
andi@...stfloor.org, mst@...hat.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
ivtv-devel@...vdriver.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35] ivtv: use kthread_worker instead of workqueue
On 07/05/2010 07:11 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> Assuming the new kthread_worker implementation is OK, this change for
> ivtv looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
> Acked-by: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
May I route this patch through wq branch? As it's not clear how this
whole patchset will end up, I think it would be better to keep things
isolated in this branch.
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists