[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3322EB.2050806@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:34:51 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the v4l-dvb tree
Em 06-07-2010 08:10, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tuesday 06 July 2010 10:51:32 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:18:20 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> diff --cc include/linux/usb/video.h
>>>> index 2d5b7fc,429c91a..0000000
>>>> --- a/include/linux/usb/video.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/usb/video.h
>>>> @@@ -160,12 -160,402 +160,409 @@@
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> +/* 4.1.2. Control Capabilities */
>>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_GET (1 << 0)
>>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_SET (1 << 1)
>>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_DISABLED (1 << 2)
>>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_AUTOUPDATE (1 << 3)
>>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_ASYNCHRONOUS (1 << 4)
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Can you move those to the first part of the header file, with the other
>>> constants ?
>>
>> Sure, I just put it there because of the section numbering in the
>> comments. This, of course, will not influence how the file looks after
>> Linus merges it - unless the conflict is fixed up by one of the
>> maintainers before Linus gets it.
>
> I had the impression that the conflict resolutions in linux-next would end up
> in mainline. I must have been wrong, sorry.
>
> Mauro, can the uvc-gadget patches go through the linux-media tree ?
If Greg is ok, that's fine for me.
Cheers,
Mauro.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists