linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Fix fallback to cplus_demangle() when bfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:43:48 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To:	Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Petkov, Borislav" <Borislav.Petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Fix fallback to cplus_demangle() when
	bfd_demangle() is not available

Em Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:31:03AM +0200, Conny Seidel escreveu:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 02:59:04 -0400 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >Since 3.81 is the latest Make version and 3.80 is just one step before
> >that, shouldnt we cherry-pick this into perf/urgent? (or is current
> >upstream unaffected?)
> 
> Current upstream is also affected. So it makes sense to put it in
> perf/urgent.

Can you please check if that patch applies to perf/urgent?
 
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/