[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100706171908.GL7387@fieldses.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:19:08 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] timers.c: document meaning of deferrable timer
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...i.umich.edu>
Steal some text from 6e453a67510 "Add support for deferrable timers".
A reader shouldn't have to dig through the git logs for the basic
description of a deferrable timer.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...i.umich.edu>
---
kernel/timer.c | 9 +++++++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index ee305c8..947bcf6 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -90,8 +90,13 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tvec_base *, tvec_bases) = &boot_tvec_bases;
/*
* Note that all tvec_bases are 2 byte aligned and lower bit of
- * base in timer_list is guaranteed to be zero. Use the LSB for
- * the new flag to indicate whether the timer is deferrable
+ * base in timer_list is guaranteed to be zero. Use the LSB to
+ * indicate whether the timer is deferrable.
+ *
+ * A deferrable timer will work normally when the system is busy, but
+ * will not cause a CPU to come out of idle just to service it; instead,
+ * the timer will be serviced when the CPU eventually wakes up with a
+ * subsequent non-deferrable timer.
*/
#define TBASE_DEFERRABLE_FLAG (0x1)
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists