[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eifgfsez.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:39:56 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, hch@...radead.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, adilger@....com, corbet@....net,
serue@...ibm.com, hooanon05@...oo.co.jp,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, sfrench@...ibm.com,
philippe.deniel@....FR, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V14 0/11] Generic name to handle and open by handle syscalls
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:10:02 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:45:45AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> > One use case i had was that if the userspace file server can directly
> > work with the returned file system UUID,
>
> I agree that the uuid should be split out from the rest of the
> filehandle, but ...
>
> > the it can build the file
> > handle for client in a single call.
>
> ... I don't understand why both need to come in the same system call.
> Is it purely an efficiency question? If so, why do you expect this to
> be significant?
Since we know that system wide file handle should include a file system
identifier and a file identifier my plan was to retrieve both in the
same syscall.
>
> (I would have thought that the system call overhead is so small, and so
> many calls will already be required to perform the typical rpc, that
> this would be insignificant.)
>
> A filesystem uuid seems like a generally useful thing (maybe more so
> than a filehandle), so it'd seem worth figuring out how to export that
> separately.
>
I can add a new syscall that returns
struct fs_uuid {
u8 fs_uuid[16];
};
long sys_get_fs_uuid(int dfd, char *name, struct fs_uuid *fsid, int flag);
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists