linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] isdn/gigaset: improve CAPI message debugging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C3392BE.4050009@imap.cc>
Date:	Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:31:58 +0200
From:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	isdn@...ux-pingi.de, hjlipp@....de, keil@...systems.de,
	i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] isdn/gigaset: improve CAPI message debugging

Am 06.07.2010 19:44 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:14:53 +0200
> 
>> So if you'll postpone applying last night's series until
>> after your next merge of net-2.6 into net-next-2.6, it
>> should then apply cleanly.
> 
> That's the kind of information I'd like to see from you when you
> post patches which have such dependencies.

Understood. It's just that I had thought my "for 2.6.35" patches
had already been applied to net-next-2.6, anyway. When I got
your complaint I noticed I had been mistaken. Sorry for that.
I know how that mistake arose, and it won't happen again.

Thanks,
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (260 bytes)