linux-kernel - [PATCH 13/49] memblock: Move memblock arrays to static storage in memblock.c and make their size a variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1278455982-24621-14-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue,  6 Jul 2010 15:39:06 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/49] memblock: Move memblock arrays to static storage in memblock.c and make their size a variable

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>

This is in preparation for having resizable arrays.

Note that we still allocate one more than needed, this is unchanged from
the previous implementation.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
---
 include/linux/memblock.h |    7 ++++---
 mm/memblock.c            |   10 +++++++++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index e849d31..b839053 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/memblock.h>
 
-#define MAX_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128
+#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128
 
 struct memblock_region {
 	phys_addr_t base;
@@ -26,8 +26,9 @@ struct memblock_region {
 };
 
 struct memblock_type {
-	unsigned long cnt;
-	struct memblock_region regions[MAX_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS+1];
+	unsigned long cnt;	/* number of regions */
+	unsigned long max;	/* size of the allocated array */
+	struct memblock_region *regions;
 };
 
 struct memblock {
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 78c2394..e1c5ce3 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
 struct memblock memblock;
 
 static int memblock_debug;
+static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1];
+static struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1];
 
 static int __init early_memblock(char *p)
 {
@@ -104,6 +106,12 @@ static void memblock_coalesce_regions(struct memblock_type *type,
 
 void __init memblock_init(void)
 {
+	/* Hookup the initial arrays */
+	memblock.memory.regions	= memblock_memory_init_regions;
+	memblock.memory.max		= INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
+	memblock.reserved.regions	= memblock_reserved_init_regions;
+	memblock.reserved.max	= INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
+
 	/* Create a dummy zero size MEMBLOCK which will get coalesced away later.
 	 * This simplifies the memblock_add() code below...
 	 */
@@ -169,7 +177,7 @@ static long memblock_add_region(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t base, ph
 
 	if (coalesced)
 		return coalesced;
-	if (type->cnt >= MAX_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS)
+	if (type->cnt >= type->max)
 		return -1;
 
 	/* Couldn't coalesce the MEMBLOCK, so add it to the sorted table. */
-- 
1.6.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/