[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C323CAD.1070602@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:12:29 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, autofs@...ux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs
On 07/05/2010 12:58 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 05 July 2010 21:48:01 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:42:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> On 07/05/2010 12:24 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter, if you're fine with this version. May I apply it?
>>>>> Unless you have a tree for autofs.
>>>>>
>>>> Ian Kent is the maintainer of autofs4 and patches for autofs4 should go
>>>> through him (or acked by him.)
>>>>
>>>> autofs 3 is officially unmaintained; I'm more than happy to have you
>>>> push the autofs 3 bits of this patch.
>>>
>>> Sure, I can split up the patch and integrate the autofs 3 part, I'll send
>>> the standalone autofs4 version to Ian.
>>
>> I think in this case it's really more appropriate to change both autofs3
>> and autofs4 together, to avoid interdependencies. Whichever way Ian
>> prefers (ack the patch or take it) would work though.
>>
>> Arnd
>
>
> Yeah indeed. Ian?
>
For what it's worth, feel free to add my:
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists