[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100706050447.GG20680@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:34:47 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/4] perf-probe updates: string support, etc.
> >>> Masami Hiramatsu (4):
> >>> perf probe: Support static and global variables
> >>> perf probe: Support tracing an entry of array
> >>> perf probe: Support "string" type
> >>> tracing/kprobes: Support "string" type
> >> What's the status of these patches? They seem very useful to me, but I
> >> don't see them in Arnaldo's tree at git.kernel.org.
> >
> > Thanks for reminding me about these ones, will look at them to get them
> > in perf/core.
>
> Thanks for picking it up. And I need to tell it to Sriker because this
> will affect his uprobes patchset (ftrace part).
> (Actually, my original plan was to update the patchset onto
> his uprobes patchset.)
>
> Sriker, the 1st patch in this series will add many macros/functions
> into trace_kprobe.c. This will directly affect your 8th patch of uprobes,
> which splits fetch functions out from trace_kprobe.c.
> Is that OK for you?
Okay, I will keep rebasing to the latest tip/master before sending out
patches for review. So I will continue to do the same when pushing the
v8 patches.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists