linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: When zero extending, do it by page.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:04:18 -0700
From:	Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To:	Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: When zero extending, do it by page.

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:19:27PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> >+static handle_t *ocfs2_zero_start_ordered_transaction(struct inode *inode)
> >+{
> >+	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
> >+	handle_t *handle = NULL;
> >+	int ret = 0;
> >+
> >+	if (ocfs2_should_order_data(inode))
> This should be if (!ocfs2_should_order_data(inode)) I guess? ;)

	Of course it should.  Fixed ;-)

Joel


-- 

"Too much walking shoes worn thin.
 Too much trippin' and my soul's worn thin.
 Time to catch a ride it leaves today
 Her name is what it means.
 Too much walking shoes worn thin."

Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/