[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278551728.28333.55.camel@pororo.lan>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:15:28 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] spufs: use llseek in all file operations
Hi Arnd,
> The default for llseek is changing, so we need
> explicit operations everywhere.
Looks good, but:
> @@ -2151,7 +2166,7 @@ static ssize_t spufs_ibox_info_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> static const struct file_operations spufs_ibox_info_fops = {
> .open = spufs_info_open,
> .read = spufs_ibox_info_read,
> - .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> + .llseek = no_llseek,
> };
>
> static ssize_t __spufs_wbox_info_read(struct spu_context *ctx,
> @@ -2194,7 +2209,7 @@ static ssize_t spufs_wbox_info_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> static const struct file_operations spufs_wbox_info_fops = {
> .open = spufs_info_open,
> .read = spufs_wbox_info_read,
> - .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> + .llseek = no_llseek,
> };
>
Why the change in behaviour for the mbox info files?
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists