linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] ima: add default rule for initramfs files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1278594883.3313.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:14:43 -0400
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ima-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ima: add default rule for initramfs files

On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:08 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> This patch modifies the default policy shipped with IMA, in order to avoid measurements
> of files in the initial ramdisk. Those files can be measured early in the boot process
> by the bootloader.
> The patch applies to latest version of the mainline kernel 2.6.35-rc4.

Yes, the initramfs measurements are therefore redundant, as they're
already included in the initramfs measurement, but perhaps, as the
number of initramfs is very limited and the individual file measurements
supplies additional information, it wouldn't hurt to keep the individual
file measurements as well.  These measurements could potentially help in
identifying initramfs changes.

Would appreciate other opinions before accepting this change.

thanks,

Mimi

> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it>
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index aef8c0a..92d8d0e 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static struct ima_measure_rule_entry default_rules[] = {
>  	{.action = DONT_MEASURE,.fsmagic = TMPFS_MAGIC,.flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
>  	{.action = DONT_MEASURE,.fsmagic = SECURITYFS_MAGIC,.flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
>  	{.action = DONT_MEASURE,.fsmagic = SELINUX_MAGIC,.flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
> +	{.action = DONT_MEASURE,.fsmagic = RAMFS_MAGIC,.flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
>  	{.action = MEASURE,.func = FILE_MMAP,.mask = MAY_EXEC,
>  	 .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK},
>  	{.action = MEASURE,.func = BPRM_CHECK,.mask = MAY_EXEC,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/