[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100708151345.GB12452@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:13:45 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>,
dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: #include device.h in gadget.h
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 01:03:27PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> >>gadget.h uses structures defined in device.h, it must include it. In
> >>most cases, gadget.h is preceded by linux/platform_device.h, but if
> >>you are grouping headers sanely, device.h may not be pulled in until
> >>*after* gadget (e.g. mach/msm_device.h), thus gadget.h should not
> >>rely on something else #including device.h
>
> As well as a number of other headers. I have postaed a patch
> addressing the missing #include's already.
Yes I know, and my same statment stands.
> >>include/linux/usb/gadget.h:488: error: field 'dev' has incomplete type
>
> >Why not just provide an "empty" prototype for whatever is needed.
>
> Empty prototype of what, 'struct device'? Have you looked at the code at all?
Nope, I try not to :)
> struct device dev;
Ok, that wouldn't work.
> >How about just fixing up the .c file that the problem happens in, to
> >include device.h first? Is this an issue in the current tree somehow?
>
> In my opinion, this is just insane approach.
Sorry, but that seems to go against what the rest of the kernel is
doing.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists