[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278604779.1900.157.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:59:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: high power consumption in recent kernels
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:23 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:46 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Looks promising, reverting the old patch, adding that one, building,
> > running, unplugging ppower, powertop runs now since some time,
> > it seems that we are back to better situation:
>
> Hrmm, Mike seems you wrecked power usage..
>
> So nohz_ratelimit() prevents us from entering NOHZ when the last attempt
> was less than 1/2 a jiffy ago (fwiw: NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ == TICK_NSEC).
>
> Its either entering idle or irq_exit trying to enter nohz state, if we
> keep skipping it it means that we get enough interrupt activity to
> render nohz useless anyway.. so not quite sure how this wrecks things..
OK, so Arjan said the gain could come from tricking the idle governor
into not using deeper C states. He also said he significantly cured said
governor in .35.
Mike could you re-run your netperf tests that showed the 10% throughput
gain? Hopefully the fixed governor will yield the same result and we can
kill off this ratelimit thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists