[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278612989.1900.176.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:16:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Call update_group_power only for local_group
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:45 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > @@ -2433,7 +2433,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
> > + if (local_group)
> > + update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
>
> if IDLE == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, then all the cpu's in the local group will do
> this. Also update_group_power() can be done on only on the local cpu,
> i.e., when this_cpu == smp_processor_id() right?
It might make sense to only update_group_power on !CPU_NEWLY_IDLE and
rely on the tick driven cpu_power updates.
No sense in updating them in finer slices I guess.
So how about something like:
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 9910e1b..2f05679 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -2427,14 +2427,14 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
* domains. In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
* to do the newly idle load balance.
*/
- if (idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && local_group &&
- balance_cpu != this_cpu) {
- *balance = 0;
- return;
+ if (idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && local_group) {
+ if (balance_cpu != this_cpu) {
+ *balance = 0;
+ return;
+ }
+ update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
}
- update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
-
/* Adjust by relative CPU power of the group */
sgs->avg_load = (sgs->group_load * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) / group->cpu_power;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists