[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007081540400.15083@router.home>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 16:01:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages,
not page order
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > AFAICT this is not argument error but someone changed the naming of the
> > parameter.
>
> It's been there since day zero:
>
> : commit 2a16e3f4b0c408b9e50297d2ec27e295d490267a
> : Author: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>
> : AuthorDate: Wed Feb 1 03:05:35 2006 -0800
> : Commit: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...osdl.org>
> : CommitDate: Wed Feb 1 08:53:16 2006 -0800
> :
> : [PATCH] Reclaim slab during zone reclaim
That only shows that the order parameter was passed to shrink_slab() which
is what I remember being done intentionally.
Vaguely recall that this was necessary to avoid shrink_slab() throwing out
too many pages for higher order allocs.
Initially zone_reclaim was full of heuristics that later were replaced by
counter as the new ZVCs became available and gradually better ways of
accounting for pages became possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists