| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100708145300.d36cf006.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:53:00 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> Subject: Re: Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:39:28 -0400 Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> wrote: > Make sure we properly call ddebug_remove_module() when a module fails to > load. In addition, pass the pointer to the "debug table", to both > ddebug_add_module(), and ddebug_remove_module() so that we can uniquely > identify each set of debug statements. In this way even modules with the > same name can be properly identified and removed. > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> It'd be nice to track the Reported-by:s. And the Tested-by:s if/when they arrive. SighIllDoIt. The patch (almost) applies to 2.6.34. So are we missing a Cc:stable tag as well? Also, this patch's title is now "Re: Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3?" which isn't very good. I can invent a new title for it, but that means we don't have a well-understood handle to refer to this patch, and to perform searches with, etc. Maybe a resend would be best.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists