linux-kernel - Re: Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:53:00 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3?

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:39:28 -0400
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> wrote:

> Make sure we properly call ddebug_remove_module() when a module fails to
> load. In addition, pass the pointer to the "debug table", to both
> ddebug_add_module(), and ddebug_remove_module() so that we can uniquely
> identify each set of debug statements. In this way even modules with the
> same name can be properly identified and removed.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>

It'd be nice to track the Reported-by:s.  And the Tested-by:s if/when
they arrive.  SighIllDoIt.

The patch (almost) applies to 2.6.34.  So are we missing a Cc:stable tag
as well?

Also, this patch's title is now "Re: Dynamic Debug broken on
2.6.35-rc3?" which isn't very good.  I can invent a new title for it,
but that means we don't have a well-understood handle to refer to this
patch, and to perform searches with, etc.

Maybe a resend would be best..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/