linux-kernel - Re: [-next July 9 - s390 ] Badness at fs/sysfs/symlink.c:82 during qeth initalization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m14og95483.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Fri, 09 Jul 2010 03:39:24 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [-next July 9 - s390 ] Badness at fs/sysfs/symlink.c:82 during qeth initalization

Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> With today's next(20100709) qeth interface fails to initialize
>>> with following Badness message:
>>>     sysfs: symlink across ns_types 0.0.6000/net:eth0 -> net/eth0
>>>     
>>
>> Is this with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED set?
>>
>> I think I may have made my warning check a little extra strict.
>>   
> Yes.
>
> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y

Ugh. It looks like the warning is correct and I have a regression
in 2.6.35 that was overlooked because I did not closely test
CONIFG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED.  I will see if I can cook up a proper
patch shortly.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/