[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100709082506.514f64ab@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:25:06 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clemens@...isch.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port
resources
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:49:32 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 04:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> So you want to use pci=override_bios to reallocate all bios assigned resource include
> >> peer root buses resources and pci bridge resource and pci devices BAR?
> >
> > In a perfect world, we'd never need this at all, but sicne that's not
> > an option, the second-best alternative might be something like the
> > following:
> >
> > pci=override=off # default
> > pci=override=conflict # override only on conflicts
> > pci=override=<device> # clear BIOS allocations for <device> (and any
> > children, if it's a bus)
>
> current:
> if there is conflict, like pci bridge resources or pci devices resources is not in the scope of peer root bus resource range.
> or pci devices is not in pci bridge resources range.
> kernel would reject the resource and try to get new range in parent resource for the children.
>
> so current default is overriding the conflicts already.
>
> Maybe your conflicts have other meaning? like pci bridge resource size is not big enough?
>
> or we can have use
>
> pci=override=small_bridge
>
> or
>
> pci=override=bridges
>
> instead?
Changing the default (and fairly old) behavior at this point will
probably cause a lot of trouble; we have machines where reallocating
conflicting or apparently mis-programmed resources is needed.
But we can still add the pci=override= option. Your patch will need
some changes though; a user needing a specific bus/bridge reallocated
can just pass the bridge id. And rather than walking its way up,
freeing and trying to re-allocate, it could just free everything below
the given device and let the normal paths allocate it.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists