[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278709550.1537.164.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:05:50 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Maciej@...ispam.struernethosting.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][for 2.6.35] tracing: Add alignment to
syscall metadata declarations
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 22:53 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> But in this case we have no control of the value of "." (current address)
> when we have processed (_ftrace_events) so it may even be at a 2 byte boundary.
> The linker will add padding as needed to satisfy the alignmnet of
> __syscalls_metadata - but that padding will be inbetween "." and the first
> member in __syscalls_metadata.
Fine, but this is a separate issue. I doubt the "ALIGN(8);" would have
helped us anyway. Remember what the issue we had:
ffffffff8173c438 <__start_syscalls_metadata>:
...
ffffffff8173c440 <__syscall_meta__mmap>:
__start_syscalls_metadata was already aligned to 8, but for some strange
reason, gcc decided to align the first member to 16.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists