linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lirc: use unlocked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100709220318.GM24110@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:03:18 -0400
From:	Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lirc: use unlocked_ioctl

On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:35:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> New code should not rely on the big kernel lock,
> so use the unlocked_ioctl file operation in lirc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> The lirc code currently conflicts with my removal of the .ioctl
> operation, which I'd like to get into linux-next.
> 
>  drivers/media/IR/ir-lirc-codec.c |    7 +++----
>  drivers/media/IR/lirc_dev.c      |   12 ++++++------
>  drivers/media/IR/lirc_dev.h      |    3 +--
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Still works for both rx and tx here w/one of my mceusb transceivers here.

Tested-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/