linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] futex: free_pi_state outside of hb->lock sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1278714780-788-4-git-send-email-dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri,  9 Jul 2010 15:32:59 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] futex: free_pi_state outside of hb->lock sections

free_pi_state() calls kfree() and might sleep. To prepare for raw hb->locks,
get the calls to free_pi_state() out of the hb->lock() sections.

Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
---
 kernel/futex.c |   14 ++++++++------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index a6cec32..b217972 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ struct futex_q {
 	struct plist_node list;
 
 	struct task_struct *task;
-	spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
+	raw_spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
 	union futex_key key;
 	struct futex_pi_state *pi_state;
 	struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_waiter;
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
 		 * task still owns the PI-state:
 		 */
 		if (head->next != next) {
-			spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1339,7 +1339,6 @@ retry_private:
 			} else if (ret) {
 				/* -EDEADLK */
 				this->pi_state = NULL;
-				free_pi_state(pi_state);
 				goto out_unlock;
 			}
 		}
@@ -1437,7 +1436,7 @@ static inline void queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
  */
 static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
 {
-	spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
+	raw_spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/* In the common case we don't take the spinlock, which is nice. */
@@ -1483,16 +1482,19 @@ retry:
  */
 static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q)
 {
+	struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL;
+
 	WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list));
 	plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);
 
 	BUG_ON(!q->pi_state);
-	free_pi_state(q->pi_state);
+	pi_state = q->pi_state;
 	q->pi_state = NULL;
 
 	spin_unlock(q->lock_ptr);
-
 	drop_futex_key_refs(&q->key);
+
+	free_pi_state(pi_state);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/