| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100708200821.35173ef8@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:08:21 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: high power consumption in recent kernels On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:44:14 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:40 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Mike could you re-run your netperf tests that showed the 10% > > > throughput gain? Hopefully the fixed governor will yield the same > > > result and we can kill off this ratelimit thing. > > > > The gain is (well was last time I checked), but as noted, I'd just > > call it a misguided optimization and be done with it. > > It would still be good to know what your machine does, if you can > still see a difference there might still be something to look at. > yeah and if you give me a reason / workload to improve the idle governor even more..... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists